support@homeworkmarkettutors.com

Call toll free: +1 (304) 900-6229 or Request a call

Week 4 Research Proposal Project: Design (Sampling, Reliability, Validity) Design For this section of your research proposal

Week 4 Research Proposal Project: Design (Sampling, Reliability, Validity)

Design

For this section of your research proposal assignment, you will focus on the sampling, reliability, and validity of your research proposal. This section will include information on sampling, reliability, and validity.

The following components should be addressed in your paper this week:

Information on your sample

· Sampling basic information (age, gender, criteria, etc.)

· Sample size

· Explain why your sample is appropriate for your study

Reliability

· Explain how your data collection process is consistent and reliable

· Explain why your measurement tool is reliable

Validity

· Explain how you will ensure you have a valid sample

· Explain how you tested the validity of your measurement tool

APA formatting, references, and citations are required.

Your research project design should be included as part of your final submission for your research proposal project in week 7 and your research proposal presentation in week 8. Use the feedback you receive from your instructor on your design to modify and improve before submission of your final project in weeks 7 and 8.

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points Possible: 75

Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Research Design Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Research Design Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and a clear explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and an explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is partially included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and an explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is absent or largely inappropriate.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReliability

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

A clear and reasonable explanation of the data collection process is included. A reliable measurement tool is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

A somewhat clear and reasonable explanation of the data collection process is included. A somewhat reliable measurement tool is included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An explanation of the data collection process and a measurement tool is absent or largely inappropriate.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValidity

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is included and appropriate. A clear explanation of sample validity is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is included and somewhat appropriate. An explanation of sample validity is included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is absent or largely inappropriate. An explanation of sample validity is absent or severely inappropriate for the study.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Accomplished

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Emerging

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

5.63 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

7.5 pts

Total Points: 75


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 In your health care career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution.   4/12/24, 10:13 PM Analyzing a Current Health Care

 In your health care career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution.   4/12/24, 10:13 PM Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue Scoring Guide files/Scoring Guides/a04_scoring_g… 1/1 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Use scholarly

* Cholelithiasis *Power point -> 12-14 slides   In short summary format, include Patient/client (use initials), Age, Gender/Gender identity,

* Cholelithiasis *Power point -> 12-14 slides   In short summary format, include Patient/client (use initials), Age, Gender/Gender identity, Race/ethnicity, diagnosis, and health care setting. Explain the pathophysiology of the condition Describe the typical clinical manifestations Briefly describe the best practice medical treatment Describe the nursing intervention(s) and health education

See attached instructions and supportive documents. Instructions: The document

See attached instructions and supportive documents. Instructions: The document should include: Two pages in length including an abstract, and a reference page. Abstract: An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of your topic. The abstract should be 350 words or less and should be accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable, and concise. The following